The Big Hole: A Memoir of Appetite

Published by Sunday, May 31, 2026 Permalink 0

by Leo Racicot

Are you the type of person who savors? Do you “ooh” and “ahh” over the garnish before a fork ever touches the plate? Do you sniff the bouquet of a wine bottle with the intensity of a bloodhound before allowing the sommelier to pour?

I am not that person. I am a “dig in and devour” sort of soul, a man with zero regard for ceremony. I suspect this habit was forged in the fires of public humiliation. Every time we went to a restaurant, my aunt would look at the server and bark: “Pile it on; Little Leo’s got a big hole to fill,” most decidedly not a charming thing to say to a total stranger about a sensitive child.

Years later, therapists would use clinical terms like “out-and-out abusive behavior” or “shaming.” At the time, I just felt like a glutton—a pig in a clip-on tie. Consequently, I never learned to savor. I only learned to hide. In formal company, I eat daintily, performing a slow-motion ballet with my peas. I have a friend, Joe—a lifetime Member of the Clean Plate Club—who eats so slowly it makes me lose my appetite. He divides his food into geometric sectors; neat little architectural piles he forks up until the ceramic beneath is squeaky clean. Dishwashers must want to marry him.

But when I’m alone? I am a human Hoover. I wolf down the meal before it has a physical chance to cool. There is a specific, quiet shame in outrunning the steam on your own plate. In school, they teach us “moderation.” Those lessons didn’t just miss me; they hit a wall and died. When I’m stress-eating, I have no idea what I’m shoveling into my face. I’m just a conveyor belt for salty-sweet snacks—popcorn, chips, and candies engineered by scientists to turn humans into addicts.

I once ate a banana I liked so much that I immediately proceeded to eat eleven more. I paid the price for that potassium heist for three days. I was apparently born with elastic bowels, or maybe decades of “gourmandizing” transmogrified them into a Power Gut.

The result? I am a relentless, world-class farter. My “Ozark Mountain Bear” blasts earned me the nickname Fartman among housemates. It’s a dubious distinction—one Stan Lee never saw fit to include in the Avengers, though the Gas-Based Avenger certainly has a ring to it and could easily send scurrying for the hills huge numbers of villains.

If you look at photos of me before age seven—before my father died— you see a happy, slender boy. Photos taken after “Papa’s Leave taking reveal a somber face, a much heavier body. A deep, caloric depression had set in.

Well into my twenties, I remained a melancholy entity; I’d pose, looking heavenward, as if expecting an apparition of the Virgin Mary to manifest on the ceiling. The only panacea for grief was a giant bowl of tortilla chips and a half-gallon of Ben & Jerry’s Cherry Garcia. The concept of “saving some for tomorrow” never occurred to me. Willpower? I don’t know her.

I hated being heavy. Fat makes the simple act of existing uncomfortable; chores become marathons and bending over becomes a logistical challenge. I put myself on a thousand Lenten sacrifices that never outlasted the sunrise. Whenever I’d hear a fellow fattie proclaim they were “fat and happy”, I’d abandon my abstinence in a flash—at least until I had to walk five feet to the corner store and ended up huffing and puffing like a broken locomotive.

I even tried Ayds. Yes, the 1970s weight-reduction candy with the most unfortunate name in marketing history. It tasted like “The Farm”—and not the good part of the farm. My mother eventually staged an intervention: “I’d stop taking those if I were you.”

My counselor says I have body dysmorphia; in my head, I’m always just a “Fat Guy” walking around belching. But I’ve found grace in odd places. Once, at the legendary M.F.K. Fisher’s table, I let out a burp I couldn’t stifle. She rescued me instantly, explaining that in Japan, a loud belch is a mandatory compliment to the cook. Suddenly, my gastrointestinal lapses weren’t “crude”—they were “international etiquette.”

There are, however, limits. I once sat through a field trip lunch where my classmates dared me to eat cow’s tongue. I declined, focusing instead on the “sides”. Then there was my friend Edmund White. Bless him, he was trying to cook a “comeback” meal after a series of strokes. The problem was, Ed had just been… intimate with a less-than hygienic 8th Avenue street hustler. After his encounter, he didn’t wash his hands before tearing the lettuce and buttering the bread.

When he plopped the steak down, it was so rare I thought he’d dragged the cow in straight from the arena. I gagged. I spent the night “appreciatively” chewing on lettuce leaves, unable to tell him that his “achievement” was my culinary cauchemar. I’ve noticed the trajectory of the human body. In our 50s and 60s, we thicken and bloat. We expand to fill the space. But then, as the clock winds down, the body begins to dissipate. It wears out.

In a way, I think it will be a relief to make that final return to the slender boy of my early youth. One day, the relentless craving for mountains of ice cream and cookies will simply stop. The “Big Hole” will finally be filled.

 

Never miss a post
Name: 
Your email address:*
Please enter all required fields
Correct invalid entries

Food Quote: Erik Satie on French Cuisine

Published by Tuesday, February 16, 2016 Permalink 0

En Art, j’aime la simplicité ; de même, en cuisine. / In art, I like simplicity; the same goes for cuisine.–Erik Satie (Honfleur 1866-Paris 1925), in Cahiers d’un Mamifère.

Never miss a post
Name: 
Your email address:*
Please enter all required fields
Correct invalid entries

The only time to eat diet food is while you’re waiting for the steak to cook.

Never miss a post
Name: 
Your email address:*
Please enter all required fields
Correct invalid entries
— Julia Child

Madame de Sévigné on Chocolate

Published by Tuesday, December 1, 2015 Permalink 1

What to Eat in France: Marquise de Sévigné on Chocolate

by Jonell Galloway

Marie de Rabutin-Chantal, born the Marquise de Sévigné, was one of France’s most prolific letter writers of the seventeenth century. Known often as simply Madame de Sévigné, she was known for her love of chocolate, although her letters of 1671 reveal that she sometimes had a love-hate relationship with it.

In her letter of February 11, 1671, to her ailing daughter, Madame de Grignan, she wrote:

“You’re not feeling well, did you not sleep? Chocolate will make you feel yourself again. A thousand times I have thought: she has no chocolatier near her, poor child. What will you do?”

Letter of May 13, 1671:

“I beg you, my dear soul, my beautiful, to not eat any more chocolate. I’ve turned against it myself. A week ago I suffered from 16 hours of colic that gave me an acute kidney infection.”

Letter of October 25, 1671, when Madame de Sévigné’s daughter, who was pregnant, continued to follow her mother’s earlier words of advice:

“Chocolate, what can we say about it? Aren’t you afraid you’ll burn your very blood? All these miraculous effects, do they not hide something obscure?”

Letter of October 28, 1671:

“I wanted to reconcile myself with chocolate. I ate some the day before yesterday to help me digest my dinner and enjoy my supper. I ate some more yesterday just to get a little nourishment and to help me fast until evening. It had all the desired effects: this is why I find it so pleasant. It does what it is intended to do.”

Translated by Jonell Galloway, from Lettres de l’année 1671

 

 

Continue Reading…

Never miss a post
Name: 
Your email address:*
Please enter all required fields
Correct invalid entries

What’s the difference between a gourmand and a gourmet?

Published by Tuesday, November 24, 2015 Permalink 1

Et pevent estre diz en francois gloutons et gourmans./ And can be said in French gluttons and gourmands.Nicolas Oresme, fourteenth century

Les gourmands font leurs fosses avec leurs dents. / Gluttons dig their graves with their own teeth.–Henri Estienne, sixteenth century

Gourmandism is an impassioned, considered, and habitual preference for whatever pleases the taste. It is the enemy of overindulgence; any man who eats too much or grows drunk risks being expelled from the army of disciples.”–Jean-Antheleme Brillat-Savarin, The Physiology of Taste (1825)

The meaning of gourmand is now certainly closer to gourmet than it is to glutton, but our evidence shows clearly that gourmand and gourmet are still words with distinct meanings in the bulk of their use, and are likely to remain so.Merriam-Webster’s Dictionary of English Usage, 1994

by Jonell Galloway

In English, there is confusion about the term gourmand. Technically, it means “one who is excessively fond of eating and drinking,” just like in French, but it is often used as a synonym for gourmet. Being a French speaker, I cringe every time I hear it used to mean “a connoisseur of food and drink.”

Yes, I’m a purist, and perhaps I’ve lived in France too long to find this acceptable, because being a gourmand has a pejorative connotation in French. It means someone who enjoys too much of a good thing and can’t quite control his appetites. It means “glutton”. It’s quite all right to be a gourmand of books or theatre, but not of food, as paradoxical as that may seem.

All major Western religions deem gluttony a sin. It is one of the Seven Cardinal Sins, with moderation being the virtue.

Gourmandizing means overeating or eating immodestly; it means eating like a refined pig or stuffing oneself with good food and drink.

Gourmand is extended to other sensual pursuits as well. You can have gourmandes lips; I’ll let you imagine the meaning of that. One can also be too gourmand about money, i.e. like in a little too much.

Then comes the question of whether gluttony includes pleasure, because gourmandise does, despite its negative connotation, contain an element of pleasure. Gourmands eat too much, but they do so with pleasure.

Gourmandise may be a sin in the eyes of religion, but thanks to Brillat-Savarin, probably France’s greatest gastronomic writer ever, it recovered its sense of finesse in his “meditations,” and he spent a good deal of time looking for evidence that it was a sin. He found none, he said. All the etymologists and theologians had gotten it wrong. He concluded that gourmandise is in reality a passionate, reasoned, regular preference for objects that please the taste buds. It is, he said, the enemy of excess and is only to be encouraged. That’s one writer’s opinion.

Some say the word gourmand probably comes from the Burgundian gorman, but that’s not clear. Gourmet is different, despite the fact that it may well have the same root, groumet, meaning “servant or valet in charge of wines,” from the Middle English grom, meaning boy or valet (as in groom). Somehow along the way gourmand took on the meaning friand, often linked to glouton, meaning “greedy.” A gourmet is a person who cultivates a discriminating palate and knows how to appreciate both good food and wine. In French, its synonyms are gastronome, expert, connoisseur, or master. In English and used as an adjective, gourmet often means “fancy” food. It does not carry with it the connotation of excess or lack of self-control, either in French or in English.

It’s interesting to look at the origins of words, and they do change meaning over time, as we have seen, and when they are borrowed by other languages. Whether this is technically the case in English with regard to gourmet and gourmand is still questionable however, because one often sees the word gourmand used in lieu of gourmet.

Never miss a post
Name: 
Your email address:*
Please enter all required fields
Correct invalid entries

People predestined to gourmandism are in general of medium height; they have round or square faces, bright eyes, small foreheads, short noses, full lips and rounded chins…..People to whom Nature has denied the capacity for such enjoyment, on the other hand, have long faces, noses, and eyes; no matter what their height, they seem to have a general air of elongation about them. They have flat dark hair, and above all lack healthy weight; it is undoubtedly they who invented trousers, to hide their thin shanks.”–in The Physiology of Taste

Never miss a post
Name: 
Your email address:*
Please enter all required fields
Correct invalid entries
— Jean-Anthelme Brillat-Savarin

What are the 5 mother sauces as defined by Auguste Escoffier in the twentieth century? Béchamel, Velouté, Espagnole, Hollandaise and Tomate.

Never miss a post
Name: 
Your email address:*
Please enter all required fields
Correct invalid entries

What are the four mother sauces?

Published by Friday, November 13, 2015 Permalink 0

What are the four mother sauces as defined by French chef Carême in the nineteenth century? Tomate, Béchamel, Velouté and Espagnole.

Never miss a post
Name: 
Your email address:*
Please enter all required fields
Correct invalid entries

Better than any argument is to rise at dawn and pick dew-wet red berries in a cup.

Never miss a post
Name: 
Your email address:*
Please enter all required fields
Correct invalid entries
— Wendell Berry

14 Food Books You Must Read

Published by Tuesday, November 10, 2015 Permalink 0

“From blogs to many popular books, food writing is now among America’s favorite forms of leisure reading. Gaining usage as a term in the early 1990s, food writing is now composed of a range of genres—non-fiction, literature, recipes, journalism, memoir, and travelogues among them—that explore the fundamental relationship between people, culture and food. In the past decade alone, the number of books that touch on food in some form have rapidly proliferated, not only in quantity and but also in quality, as many of our nation’s most skilled writers are now taking food as their topic of choice.” Read more here.

Never miss a post
Name: 
Your email address:*
Please enter all required fields
Correct invalid entries

UA-21892701-1